An IRCC document review is a professional check of your application before you submit it.

It’s not just making sure files are uploaded.
It’s checking whether your documents actually make sense all together.

We look at whether:

- Your documents meet IRCC’s requirements

- Your forms and supporting documents match each other

- Your situation is explained clearly and logically

- An IRCC officer can easily understand your story

- Your documents support the program you’re applying under

The purpose is simple:
to help you get your application approved the first time by reducing avoidable mistakes.

Because IRCC doesn’t just check whether documents are there.
They check whether everything makes sense all together.

Officers look at:

- Credibility

- Consistency

- Eligibility

Common reasons applications get refused include:

- Forms and supporting documents don’t match

- Gaps in work, study, or travel history are not explained clearly

- Letters of Explanation are vague or generic

- Documents exist but don’t clearly prove eligibility

- Information raises doubts about intent, accuracy, or completeness

IRCC officers are trained to spot risk and unclear stories.
Simply uploading documents is not enough.

What matters is whether your documents tell a clear, believable story that meets IRCC’s decision standards.

For a deeper explanation of how IRCC evaluates applications beyond document completeness, you may find this guide helpful:
👉 How IRCC Evaluates Immigration Applications

IRCC looks beyond the checklist.
They want to see whether your application tells a clear and believable story.

Officers check whether:

- All forms and documents make sense all together

- Your explanations clearly address gaps or changes

- Your documents support your work, education, and intent

- Your situation fits the program you’re applying under

- Your overall case feels credible and reasonable

The checklist only shows what to submit.
IRCC’s decision is based on how convincing and reliable your application is as a whole.

This assessment logic is explained in detail in our educational guide on how IRCC evaluates immigration applications in practice:
👉 How IRCC Evaluates Immigration Applications

No one can guarantee approval.
All decisions are made by IRCC.

What this review improves is the quality of what you submit.

We help you:

- Fix inconsistencies and unclear information

- Strengthen explanations where documents alone aren’t enough

- Reduce common mistakes that often lead to refusals

IRCC officers decide based on clarity, consistency, and credibility.
That’s what this review focuses on.

And to reduce your risk even further, we include a guarantee:
- if your application is refused and you obtain the IRCC notes, we will review your case again at no extra cost.

The goal is simple:
- to submit a clear, complete, and well-explained application, and avoid preventable mistakes the first time.

Our document checklists are created using insights from 37,000+ hours of real application review experience with IRCC cases.

This experience helps us focus on clarity, consistency, and common risk points that generic checklists don’t cover.

IRCC’s checklist shows what documents must be submitted.
It does not explain how those documents are reviewed together.

Our checklist focuses on how your documents work as a package.

It helps you check whether:

- Your forms and documents are consistent

- Your explanations clearly address gaps or unusual details

- Your documents actually support your eligibility claims

IRCC’s checklist helps you avoid missing files.

Our checklist helps you avoid confusion, contradictions, and weak explanations.

That difference matters, because IRCC officers decide based on clarity, credibility, and how everything fits together.

IRCC does not review documents one by one.
They review the entire application as a package.

Documents interact with each other.
Inconsistencies often appear across multiple forms.
Explanations only make sense when everything is seen together.

Some services review documents individually.
We review applications as a whole.

That’s because IRCC makes decisions based on the full picture, not isolated files.

Our pricing reflects that approach.

By charging per application, we can:

- Review all documents in context

- Catch contradictions across forms and letters

- Make sure explanations support the overall story

Our focus isn’t maximizing fees.

It’s helping your entire application work together and reducing avoidable risks before you submit.

Yes, but in a different way.

Once an application is submitted, we can’t change what IRCC has already received.
That part is fixed.

However, reviewing your submitted documents can still be very useful.

From our experience, more than 60% of DIY applicants we see are refused on their first submission, not because they are ineligible, but because their documents are unclear, inconsistent, or poorly organized.

A post-submission review can help you:

- Identify weaknesses or risk points in what you already submitted

- Prepare properly for a second submission, if needed

- Understand what IRCC is likely to question

More importantly, while you are waiting for a decision, you may still have a chance to submit additional supporting documents through IRCC webforms.

This is often the last opportunity to clarify issues, fix gaps, or strengthen explanations before a decision is made.

Used properly, this can sometimes help avoid a refusal, or at least put you in a much stronger position for what comes next.

The review won’t influence IRCC’s current assessment directly.
But it helps you make informed, timely decisions instead of guessing.

Refusals can still happen.
Some reasons are outside document quality.

IRCC may refuse an application due to:

- Eligibility rules

- Admissibility issues

- Program limits or officer discretion

What this review does is reduce avoidable documentation risks.

It helps make your application clearer, more consistent, and easier for an officer to assess.

But it cannot remove every possible refusal factor.

If a refusal happens, we don’t leave you guessing.

We help you submit an ATIP request for free, so you can obtain the IRCC officer’s notes.

These notes explain the real reasons behind the refusal — not assumptions.

Once the notes are available, we will:

- Review the refusal reasons with you

- Identify what went wrong and why

- Clarify what needs to be improved or explained

- Help you prepare for a stronger second submission

That’s why we include a second review guarantee.
If your application is refused and you obtain the IRCC notes, we will review your case again at no extra cost.

The goal is not to promise an IRCC approval. Our goal is to provide you clarity, learning from the refusal, and to give you a much stronger chance the second time.

Generic feedback looks at formatting and basic completeness.
That’s not what we do.

Our review looks at how your documents work together as a real application.

Your feedback is based on:

- Your actual documents and personal situation

- The specific program you’re applying under

- Common refusal patterns we’ve seen in similar IRCC cases

We don’t use templates.
We don’t copy and paste advice.

Each review is shaped by real review experience, including thousands of hours dealing with IRCC applications and refusals.

The goal is simple:
to find issues that are unique to your application, and tell you exactly what needs attention — not generic advice you could find online.

Yes — in some cases, we can help with that.

Our main service focuses on review and feedback.
You remain responsible for revising and submitting your documents.

However, if your documents need more than guidance, we do offer a rewrite or polish service.

This is helpful when:

- Your explanation is unclear or poorly structured

- English is not your first language

- The document needs stronger logic or tone for IRCC review

Rewrite and polish services are:

- Optional

- Priced based on complexity

- Starting at CAD 97 per document

You always remain responsible for the accuracy and truthfulness of the information.
We do not invent content or change facts.

Our role is to help your documents communicate your case clearly and professionally, while keeping ownership of the application with you.